Six months after launch, are they using the right SKUs? Did a competitive product sneak back in? Are they close to qualifying for the next pricing tier?
Most contracts underperform, not because the deal was bad, but because nobody actively manages them after launch.
Compliance drifts. Members who committed to your contract start buying off-contract from competitors because nobody followed up. Facilities that should be on a higher pricing tier don't realize they're close to qualifying, so they stay where they are. SKU proliferation creeps in: departments bring in alternative products without going through value analysis, and suddenly your contracted share is eroding from the inside.
The GPO partner sees it in the data. Your QBR tells the story. But if you're only looking at the numbers quarterly, you've already lost months of potential revenue. And when the renewal cycle comes around, underperformance weakens your position because the GPO evaluates whether to keep you based on what the contract actually delivered, not what it was projected to deliver.
There's an internal version of this problem, too. A field rep promises tier 4 pricing because that's what they believe the account qualifies for, while your IDN director is offering tier 3 as part of a broader health system negotiation. When those two scenarios collide at the supply chain or C-suite level, your credibility takes the hit. The cause is usually structural: commissions that reward territory protection, no communication cadence between national accounts and the field, and no agreement on who leads at which level. No utilization report will show you that problem, but it drags contract performance all the same.
We help you find and fix the specific issues holding your contracts back. This isn't a general "strategy refresh." It's an operational deep dive into utilization data, compliance gaps, and competitive dynamics at the facility level. The fastest growth rarely comes from the next award. It comes from maximizing the contracts you already hold.
A clear picture of current contract performance broken down by facility, region, and product line. A prioritized list of improvement opportunities ranked by expected revenue impact. Targeted action plans for underperforming segments. Templates and talk tracks for compliance outreach to non-converting members. A QBR framework that tells a compelling story to your GPO partner. And a monitoring cadence that keeps optimization active, not a one-time project but an ongoing discipline.
Where internal alignment is part of the problem, you also get a clear delineation of who leads the conversation at which level, communication cadences that keep national accounts and the field working the same plan, and a compensation alignment review with specific recommendations if structural incentives are creating friction.
Tell us about your contract performance challenges. We'll help you find the gaps and build the plan to close them.
Schedule a MeetingOr call us directly: 443-277-2302